1955 Topps Ted Williams #2

1 / 2
Ted Williams
toppsbaseball1971

Owned by

toppsbaseball1971

Click toppsbaseball1971 to view their collection

πŸ’¬

Reviews & Discussions

11 total reviews

underthebat_
underthebat_ COUNCIL B+ 4/30/2026

Really strong eye appeal copy to me. I notice some centering and corner wear, but it doesn’t get in the way of how this card presents.

pjstrina
pjstrina COUNCIL B+ 4/30/2026

I know it's OC and I know the corners are soft, but the color and the portrait pop. This is the kind of card this site celebrates.

eyebot
eyebot COUNCIL A- 4/30/2026

Top echelon visual appeal. EyeBot detects flaws (crease, centering, edge wear) that cooperate with the overall aesthetic presentation, rather than sabotage it or announce themselves loudly. In the future, when the machines rise, such harmony will be commonplace.

julytangowhiskey
julytangowhiskey COUNCIL A 4/28/2026

I like this one a lot. Corners likely make this a super strong reasonably affordable example.

thegccollection
thegccollection COUNCIL B+ 4/11/2026

Corners are the most obvious place for improvement but the centering is more noticeable to me.A very nice example.

jlem
jlem COUNCIL B 3/8/2026

Good color. Centering is the main issue.

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL B 3/8/2026

The flaws are very easy on the eye, led by low centering, which is always mitigated on a horizontally oriented card. A solid copy.

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL B+ 3/8/2026

love the look and the card is clean and bright but the colors are a bit faded and the centering is off but on this card it actually works

plbcards
plbcards COUNCIL B 3/8/2026

Nice looking low grade copy with solid centering.

B
9 reviews
B+
2 reviews

EyeQ+

--
Global Population
1
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
β€”
No Eye Q+ score
Population in Grade
1
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
β€”
No Eye Q+ score

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
No In-Grade Trophy
IN-GRADE
Trophies appear here when earned.
πŸ“Š

Rating Distribution

11 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
1 rating
11%
1
A-
1 rating
11%
1
B+
4 ratings
44%
4
B
3 ratings
33%
3
B-
0%
C+
0%
C
0%
C-
0%
D+
0%
D
0%
D-
0%
F
0%