1949 Bowman Stan Musial #24

1 / 2
Stan Musial
💬

Reviews & Discussions

13 total reviews

jrock1956topps
jrock1956topps COUNCIL B+ 8/30/2025

Nice clean image and deep colors but the staining detracts a bit from the eye appeal for me. That said, much nicer than the technical grade to my eyes.

jlee_sportscardslive
jlee_sportscardslive COUNCIL A+ 8/30/2025

Amazing copy. I would love to add this exact card to my PC. Color and reg are amazing as is centering.

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL A 8/20/2025

I am feeling this; its flaws don't detract from the beauty. The color is rich, there are no glaring blemishes in the background, the image is in focus, the centering is nearly there but certainly on the edge of the bullseye. Punches very far above its weight.

sportscardex
sportscardex COUNCIL C+ 8/20/2025

Staining on the white borders hurts the eye appeal. But the card colors themselves are absolutely gorgeous!

p_baseball_14
p_baseball_14 COUNCIL A 8/18/2025

Great rich, dark color and centering is solid.

schneidscardstash
schneidscardstash COUNCIL B+ 8/18/2025

That is a deep blue. Great surface for a low grade, and at least it's consistent with rounded corners.

thenationalpastime
thenationalpastime COUNCIL B- 8/18/2025

Color and upper right border.

nmmt
nmmt COUNCIL B 8/17/2025

pjstrina
pjstrina COUNCIL B+ 8/17/2025

Nice, just centering is all to my eye.

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL C+ 8/17/2025

to much yellowing of the card especially in the top right 1/4 of the card and it stands out as bottom left is alot brighter. That sharp contrast is to much for my eyes to see beyond it And that is a shame because the card image looks solid and the borders are nice sized

B
10 reviews
C+
3 reviews

EyeQ+

131.0
Global Population
3
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
#2
Population in Grade
1
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
#1

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

Global Badge Level 2
2nd Place
GLOBAL
In-Grade Badge Level 1
1st Place
IN-GRADE
📊

Rating Distribution

13 total reviews

G
0%
A+
1 rating
10%
1
A
2 ratings
20%
2
A-
0%
B+
3 ratings
30%
3
B
1 rating
10%
1
B-
1 rating
10%
1
C+
2 ratings
20%
2
C
0%
C-
0%
D+
0%
D
0%
D-
0%
F
0%