Have you added OWNER COMMENTS to your cards? Share their history. Comments are revealed after reviewing.

1958 Topps M.mantle/h.aaron #418

1 / 2
M.mantle/h.aaron
Click to enlarge
💬

Reviews & Discussions

9 total reviews

eyebot
eyebot COUNCIL B- 10/8/2026

EyeBot logs centering as the chief— and indeed only— factor that adversely affects visual appeal on this Batting Foes example.

thegccollection
thegccollection COUNCIL B- 10/3/2026

Centering issues really hit the eye on first look.

spacebearcards
spacebearcards COUNCIL C+ 9/1/2026

A clean white border and respectable edges give this card a solid overall presentation. The left-to-right centering is quite good, though it would benefit from coming down approximately four clicks. The yellow box beneath the photograph appears slightly faded, and the image itself also lacks some of the vibrancy seen on stronger examples of this card. Otherwise, it remains a decent-looking copy with good overall eye appeal.

julytangowhiskey
julytangowhiskey COUNCIL B+ 8/29/2026

Looks near pack fresh, just a little off top to bottom

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL B- 8/26/2026

Centering shift is significant here and makes impact on eye appeal, with surface/print a secondary area of note. The other aspects to my eye are much higher. Remains in the good second tier.

jlem
jlem COUNCIL C+ 8/5/2026

Off-centered and has surface wear.

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL B 8/5/2026

The card is nice and bright but the centering is off to much for my liking and also has background wear

B-
Locked
B+
2 reviews

EyeQ+

121.0
Global Population
6
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
#3
Population in Grade
1
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE AND GRADING COMPANY
Eye Rank in Grade
#1

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

Global Badge Level 3
3rd Place
GLOBAL
In-Grade Badge Level 1
1st Place
IN-GRADE
📊

Rating Distribution

9 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
0%
A-
0%
B+
1 rating
14%
1
B
1 rating
14%
1
B-
3 ratings
43%
3
C+
2 ratings
29%
2
C
0%
C-
0%
D+
0%
D
0%
D-
0%
F
0%