1952 Topps Mickey Mantle #311

1 / 2
Mickey Mantle
💬

Reviews & Discussions

15 total reviews

jackies_and_jordans
jackies_and_jordans COUNCIL B 9/19/2025

calvindog
calvindog COUNCIL A+ 9/14/2025

Centering keeps it from God tier. But how can you quibble with the grade?

jlee_sportscardslive
jlee_sportscardslive COUNCIL A 9/11/2025

Only held back by centering, which is still strong for the card.

mlormer-collection
mlormer-collection COUNCIL A+ 9/10/2025

We could nitpick the left to right centering, but why? Incredible example. Huzzah to the owner of this monster!

schneidscardstash
schneidscardstash COUNCIL B+ 9/7/2025

The tilt is severe, and centering is noticeably off. A nice example but I’m not seeing 8.5 eye appeal

p_baseball_14
p_baseball_14 COUNCIL B 8/21/2025

There is just no way a card with this centering should be such a high grade. Eye Appeal wise, the tilt and centering make it a B to look at. I'd much prefer a dead centered 6 or 7 to this--and that is before we even consider this card with worse centering and tilt would likely cost MORE than the prettier example!

spacebearcards
spacebearcards COUNCIL B 8/21/2025

For a 1952 Topps, this copy impresses right away with corners that look almost defiant of its age—razor sharp and strikingly clean. The print registration holds up well, though the yellowing in the blue and across his hands and under the hat is more distracting than one would expect from an 8.5. Centering is another knock, as it drifts enough to undercut the overall eye appeal. Still, the card has undeniable presence, just not quite enough to earn top marks. A respectable and honest B.

dchase
dchase COUNCIL B 8/21/2025

Off centering and dirt or scuff marks on his bat knock this down

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL A 8/4/2025

The colors and the image POPS the corners look good and borders are clean. The off centering on this level of card is the grade difference

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL B- 7/27/2025

This is pedestrian centering for this card. The tilt makes it unattractive to my eye despite the sharp corners. In fact, this 3rd party grade seems both high and tantamount to a "corners only" grade. Were I shopping for this in the 60s or 70s and the cards were raw, I would pass this example right by without a thought due to the left white border being so much thinner than the right, at the top of the card. This card is a prime example of the 3rd party system being out of harmony with collector eyeballs, because while the difference to the naked eye in corners between this card and an 8 or 7.5's corners is negligible, at best, any naked eye can see tilt and off centering.

B+
10 reviews
B
5 reviews

EyeQ+

96.0
Global Population
136
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
#40
Population in Grade
3
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
#2

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
In-Grade Badge Level 2
2nd Place
IN-GRADE
📊

Rating Distribution

15 total reviews

G
0%
A+
2 ratings
20%
2
A
2 ratings
20%
2
A-
0%
B+
1 rating
10%
1
B
4 ratings
40%
4
B-
1 rating
10%
1
C+
0%
C
0%
C-
0%
D+
0%
D
0%
D-
0%
F
0%