1952 Topps Mickey Mantle #311

1 / 2
Mickey Mantle
💬

Reviews & Discussions

19 total reviews

spacebearcards
spacebearcards COUNCIL F 8/7/2025

Unfortunately, this copy falls short on eye appeal and misses the mark on every grading standard. The centering is severely off, the corners and edges show noticeable wear, and the surface lacks the vibrancy collectors look for. While it may hold value as a popular card, it simply can’t compete with higher-grade examples.

schneidscardstash
schneidscardstash COUNCIL D+ 8/6/2025

Luckily just owning a 52T Mantle is more than enough to write home about. With that said there’s just too much detracting from this copy.

jackies_and_jordans
jackies_and_jordans COUNCIL D- 8/5/2025

Missing a chunk and multiple creases. Almost an F but the above average centering bumped it up to a D- for me

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL C- 7/21/2025

Petty good centering and color but the issues with the creases, edges and especially the corners brings it down

thegccollection
thegccollection COUNCIL C+ 7/21/2025

This card has a load of charm.if that corner want missing…

luke
luke COUNCIL C+ 7/21/2025

It's a mantle, it's a 1, it's got a chip on its shoulder and not a crease in the face. I've seen worse. I'd love to own it, but it wouldn't be a keeper and that matters on a card that has an entry price of $20k.

thenationalpastime
thenationalpastime COUNCIL F 7/14/2025

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL F 7/11/2025

This is just an accurately graded card. Wear commensurate with the third party assessment.

jlee_sportscardslive
jlee_sportscardslive COUNCIL D 7/8/2025

The chunk out of the corner devastates the eye appeal. Layer on the creases, folds and surface wear and this is just a notch above F..

jrock1956topps
jrock1956topps COUNCIL D- 7/8/2025

Even for a 1 grade, this is rough with a large piece missing from the bottom left corner that takes the focal attention away from the image on the card. This is an example where, in my opinion, I would not consider a numerical grade appropriate and would rate it at the bottom of any grading scale.

D
10 reviews
D+
9 reviews

EyeQ+

107.0
Global Population
136
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
#31
Population in Grade
75
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
#15

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
No In-Grade Trophy
IN-GRADE
📊

Rating Distribution

19 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
0%
A-
0%
B+
0%
B
0%
B-
0%
C+
2 ratings
20%
2
C
0%
C-
1 rating
10%
1
D+
1 rating
10%
1
D
1 rating
10%
1
D-
2 ratings
20%
2
F
3 ratings
30%
3