1933 Goudey Babe Ruth #144

1 / 2
Babe Ruth
πŸ’¬

Reviews & Discussions

13 total reviews

incardboardveritas
incardboardveritas COUNCIL D- 10/10/2025

Ouch. The color is a huge part of what makes these cards so special and beautiful. My hope is that this one was well enjoyed on the desk of a fine & charitable gentleman in a sun-filled room for some number of decades.

kendallcat
kendallcat COUNCIL B- 10/10/2025

Corners and edges are very strong for this card - first thing I noticed. Color and image appear slightly faded overall with centering a little off t/b, but not too many PSA 7’s out there of the Babe!

jlee_sportscardslive
jlee_sportscardslive COUNCIL F 10/7/2025

The faded surface overrides and nullifies its strong edges and corners. Send this one in for a CT scan it has been overexposed to sunlight and may have cancer.

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL F 10/4/2025

The extreme fading sadly kills this one, for my taste.

arnotcollection
arnotcollection COUNCIL C- 10/3/2025

Color looks way off, very faded. Not sure if that's a scanner issue, but it's very noticeable. The Face looks blurry as well, and centering is off top to bottom a little.

dchase
dchase COUNCIL C 10/3/2025

The color is very dim on this version which is important for me. But... the card has incredible edges and corners. It could also be centered a little better.

junkwaxhero
junkwaxhero COUNCIL D 9/22/2025

Oh dear... was this left out in the sun for a month?

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL D+ 9/22/2025

All I see is the fading and it effects the colors which are way off and the image which is no longer sharp. Then I see the fading and then I realize I sadly cannot see past it. The centering left to right is good but top to bottom an opportunity. But it all comes back to the fading for me

calvindog
calvindog COUNCIL D- 9/22/2025

So ugly. All the good parts of the card are missing.

jrock1956topps
jrock1956topps COUNCIL D 9/22/2025

This is an interesting one because it was reholdered based on the cert number so the question in my mind is whether the card was severely faded when it was originally graded two decades ago or was it left in sunlight after it was originally graded? Should it have received a different grade when it was reholdered? For our purposes here, it doesn’t really matter does it? The card has diminished eye appeal due to extreme fading and the centering is lacking as well.

D-
10 reviews
D-
3 reviews

EyeQ+

59.0
Bad
Global Population
22
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
β€”
Requires Eye Q+ β‰₯ 80
Population in Grade
4
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
β€”
Requires Eye Q+ β‰₯ 80

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
No In-Grade Trophy
IN-GRADE
Trophies appear here when earned.
πŸ“Š

Rating Distribution

13 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
0%
A-
0%
B+
0%
B
0%
B-
1 rating
10%
1
C+
0%
C
1 rating
10%
1
C-
1 rating
10%
1
D+
1 rating
10%
1
D
2 ratings
20%
2
D-
2 ratings
20%
2
F
2 ratings
20%
2