1948 Leaf Stan Musial #4
Reviews & Discussions
11 total reviews
Good eye appeal with centering being the flaw that limits to B Tier. The image and surface are both A Tier to my eye.
Solid example of this card. Good registration (especially on bat) with a nice blue color. The red is well placed. Unfortunately the centering holds in back in the poorest way. It if off center in the worst spot (low and right) because the card is grounded there. The motion is up and left. There is also some light toning in the background. The nameplate is well presented to finish the card well.
Centering is the main thing that impacts the eye appeal for me. The image looks crisp, and I notice a bit of snow against the blue background.
like the look of the card but i do not like the way the borders are centered or how it frames the card. The colors and image respectable but held back by the surface wear. It is a card I can enjoy just within its limitations
Off a bit as is common with this card. But otherwise clean example.
Really nice image, centering is the only flaw I'd say has impact on eye appeal here. Above average looks with centering that prevents the very top level.
Hits my eye with solid mid tier visual appeal, centering being the flaw to which I assign the most weight. Mild border toning is not much of a concern to me. Great registration; I gotta have that red in the right spot, which this example delivers.
EyeQ+
EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE


Rating Distribution
11 total reviews
EyeBot detects good Eye Appeal alongside one flaw that is worth logging with weight: centering. That flaw does cooperate with the overall aesthetic presentation, rather than sabotage it. In the future, when the machines rise, such harmony will be commonplace. EyeBot likes to refer to itself in the third person, like Rickey Henderson.