1953 Topps Luke Easter #2

Obvious flaws but love the ballpoint placement

Cool period piece with period condition and what appears to be period auto. Well placed too.

That auto wins me over and the image has no issues. Centering keeps it from the A level.

I really have come to approach eye appeal on signed vintage differently than I do unsigned cards. These signed pieces demand a more "overall" viewing and approach. I like the look of this piece and the placement location, along with the fine point detail of the signature. Centering affects but to a much milder degree than were this unsigned.

Beautiful auto, but centering and surface hold this back for me.

I love the placement decision by Luke and the penmanship! Centering is low of course and is the main issue for me.

Looks like he fit his signature in the best spot he could, but it's faded and doesn't look great in that spot. Card centering isn't helping the eye appeal either.

Its an autographed card and that is a plus. But neither the card or the autograph enhances the other. They both have opportunities. The autograph is legible but not clean, not well placed, and not bold. The card has condition issues a plenty and overall if you collect autographed cards this would be a place holder for me