1950 Bowman Jackie Robinson #22

1 / 2
Jackie Robinson
💬

Reviews & Discussions

14 total reviews

jlee_sportscardslive
jlee_sportscardslive COUNCIL D- 10/7/2025

Jackie looks great but the staining hurts the appeal and the reverse paper loss brings it down further.

pjstrina
pjstrina COUNCIL D+ 10/7/2025

Love the autograph. Could go so much higher on eye appeal grade if that thing was not on or in his cap.

thegccollection
thegccollection COUNCIL C+ 9/26/2025

That auto is so great. The tape or stain in lower left is not a problem for me. I'd even look past the centering. The notch in his cap and the focus hurt the eye appeal.

schneidscardstash
schneidscardstash COUNCIL C- 9/24/2025

Really incredible Jackie signature. Unfortunate that it sits on a card so heavily worn. There's too much that could potentially distract from what matters, the autograph.

arnotcollection
arnotcollection COUNCIL C- 9/24/2025

I won't go lower on the grade because this is an iconic card unsigned and very tough to find signed. But this would be a placeholder only until I could upgrade. Decent looking signature but the surface has obvious issues.

luke
luke COUNCIL C- 9/24/2025

It's a signed Jackie, the owner is lucky to have it. But no thank you for me. I'd wait to get one without an issue on his face and no front-side tape stains.

dchase
dchase COUNCIL D+ 8/14/2025

Hard to have nice eye appeal with tape marks on the front.

sportscardex
sportscardex COUNCIL B- 8/7/2025

Auto placement is suboptimal but the card is worthy

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL C 8/7/2025

I like the over all look of this card. That is a nice autograph in a nice location unfortunately the staining on front and back is a bit overwhelming

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL C+ 7/16/2025

Man, oh, man, do I wish we could magically put this autograph on a better card. Prime example of what makes signed vintage so tough. Very cool piece overall yet the eye appeal suffers from the card's issues, though that bold auto pops and saves it from sinking below C, to this beholder.

C-
10 reviews
C+
4 reviews

EyeQ+

--
Not eligible for AUTH cards
Global Population
7
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
—
Not eligible for AUTH cards
Population in Grade
3
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
—
Not eligible for AUTH cards

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
No In-Grade Trophy
IN-GRADE
EyeQ+ scores are not available for AUTH cards.
📊

Rating Distribution

14 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
0%
A-
0%
B+
0%
B
0%
B-
1 rating
10%
1
C+
2 ratings
20%
2
C
1 rating
10%
1
C-
3 ratings
30%
3
D+
2 ratings
20%
2
D
0%
D-
1 rating
10%
1
F
0%