1954 Topps Hank Aaron #128

1 / 2
Hank Aaron
đź’¬

Reviews & Discussions

15 total reviews

dchase
dchase COUNCIL C- 8/12/2025

The good news is.... it is centered, the rest of the card needs a little love with a messy signature.

jlee_sportscardslive
jlee_sportscardslive COUNCIL D 8/12/2025

schneidscardstash
schneidscardstash COUNCIL D+ 8/7/2025

Faded auto hurts so much more than the troubled card. It is what it is, but I need more with this card being so available in the market.

jackies_and_jordans
jackies_and_jordans COUNCIL D 8/6/2025

Oof. I don't know about that auto. Regardless, this card is hideous. It looks like it went through the washing machine and then was left out under the sun for a month to dry.

thenationalpastime
thenationalpastime COUNCIL C- 8/5/2025

luke
luke COUNCIL C 7/22/2025

jrock1956topps
jrock1956topps COUNCIL D 7/22/2025

The old “left the cap off the sharpie too long” auto does some unfortunate damage here. The good news is that the card was already in worn condition. The possibility of adding a nice signature may have been the intent, but the sharpie was not having it on this day, nor was Hammerin’ Hank.

mrreality68
mrreality68 COUNCIL D 7/21/2025

The auto location is bad and sadly the auto is worse Overall eye appeal is just not there

thegccollection
thegccollection COUNCIL D 7/21/2025

mattyc_collection
mattyc_collection COUNCIL F 7/16/2025

Card has serious fading issues, the corners are rough even for a guy like me who does not care soo much about them-- but the real problem here is the auto. I cannot read the first name and the fading is extreme.

D+
10 reviews
C-
5 reviews

EyeQ+

--
Not eligible for AUTH cards
Global Population
216
POPULATION ACROSS ALL GRADES AND GRADING COMPANIES
Global Eye Rank
—
Not eligible for AUTH cards
Population in Grade
113
POPULATION IN THIS GRADE ACROSS ALL GRADING COMPANIES
Eye Rank in Grade
—
Not eligible for AUTH cards

EYEQ+ TROPHY CASE

No Global Trophy
GLOBAL
No In-Grade Trophy
IN-GRADE
EyeQ+ scores are not available for AUTH cards.
📊

Rating Distribution

15 total reviews

G
0%
A+
0%
A
0%
A-
0%
B+
0%
B
0%
B-
0%
C+
0%
C
1 rating
10%
1
C-
2 ratings
20%
2
D+
1 rating
10%
1
D
5 ratings
50%
5
D-
0%
F
1 rating
10%
1